Aristotle And Kant Virtue Ethics - 1847 Words

Aristotle and Kant are great philosophers who have made substantial efforts to focus on the issue of virtue ethics. Virtue ethics is a wide term for principles that focus on the moral act that brings about good values. Aristotle and Kant are virtue ethicist since they attempt to offer moral advice to the society. Most virtue ethicist emulates Aristotle who affirmed that a righteous person should have the ideal traits. These traits originate from natural innermost tendencies but societies need to nurture them. Unlike, deontological theory, eudaemonist do not predominantly ascertain universal principles applicable in the moral state. This research essay discusses Aristotle’s eudaemonist virtue in comparison to Kantian deontological virtue ethics. Although Kantian deontological places greater emphasis on duty, eudaemonist places greater emphasis on virtuous actions to promote happiness or good life.Aristotle’s eudaemonist virtue differs to some degree from that of Deontolo gical ethics. First, Kantian Deontological places greater emphasis on duty while Aristotle places greater emphasis on virtuous actions. Deontology is a Greek word known as â€Å"Deon†, which translates as â€Å"duty†. Demonologist believes that it is the moral duty to treat others well and with dignity, as well as respect. In simple terms, deontology ethical theory merely focuses on what a rational moral agent can do, and that is duty rather than the consequences of an act. Kant notes that universal law exists; thus, aShow MoreRelatedAristotle s Virtue Ethics And Kant s Ethics Essay1271 Words   |  6 Pagesmany philosophers, such as Aristotle and Immanuel Kant, wouldn’t have found a need to construct a universal solution. However, where are we today in terms of ethical and moral standpoints? It sounds desirable to proclaim that ancient virtues no longer matter in today’s world, but that’s simply not the case. We, as in humans, use ethics as a re ference to our decision making on a daily basis. Whether it’s holding a door for someone or listening to an instructor’s lecture, ethics plays a significant roleRead MoreKant And Aristotle s Views On Ethics And Morals1480 Words   |  6 PagesStrom Philosophy 300 Class Section 1200 Recitation-Tuesday 10am 2/11/2015 What Is The Highest Good? Immanuel Kant and Aristotle are two of the most prominent philosophers on ethics and morals. Each has their own idea about human life and what the highest good is. It has even been said that in his Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals Kant disproves Aristotle’s view. In order to prove that Kant successfully disproves Aristotle’s theory, we must first understand both theories. After a successful understandingRead MoreThomas Aquinas And John Stuart Mill1582 Words   |  7 PagesAlexis Hoffman Professor Madison Introduction to Ethics October 15, 2017 TITLE There are four main philosophers that set the basis for different styles of ethics. The four Philosophers that made a huge impact on us all are Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill. All four philosophers are very well known for their intelligence and work in the ethics community. Although all of the philosophers have the same goal of defining ethics and how we should behave in terms of the highestRead MorePhilosophical Analysis of Aristotle883 Words   |  4 Pages Philosophical analysis of Aristotle Many theorists consider Aristotle to be the first person to use the term â€Å"ethics† in naming the field of study that had already been subject to develop by his predecessors Socrates and Plato. Philosophical ethics attempts in offering the rational response to the questions regarding how the human beings live. Aristotle used to be regarding politics and ethics as two related but very separate field of study because ethics examines the good concerning an individualRead MoreComparing The Theories Of Aristotle And Kants Theory Of Ethics884 Words   |  4 PagesIn this paper, I will compare the theories of Aristotle and Kant on the basis of ethics. I will be examining Aristotle’s theory of virtue in which his focus is â€Å"What is a Good Life† and Kant’s theory of deontological ethics in which the moral worth of an action lies in the duty upon which moral actions are engendered. To begin, Aristotles moral theory (theory of virtue) focuses on questions about what is good? His focus is What is the good life? What does it mean to be a good person? (KemerlingRead MoreHow Should One Live914 Words   |  4 Pagesof these perspectives; Aristotelian virtue ethics and Kantian duty ethics. Moral philosophy is to depict the absolute ideal (Sullivan, 1980), Aristotelian virtue ethics argues that a virtuous eudemonic life constitutes a moral one. Kant differs; morality is rational and the categorical imperative it to be abided by to live as such. Aristotle is the main proponent in the field of virtue ethics, culminating in the seminal work on the Subject; Nicomachean Ethics (NE). NE recognises a life well livedRead MoreAristotle s Theory Of Virtue Ethics1095 Words   |  5 Pagesâ€Å"The beginning seems to be more than half of the whole.† ― Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics Ethics is the philosophical study of moral judgements (Solomon: 2010). Moral philosophy has long been dominated by two basic theories; deontology, inspired by Immanuel Kant, the eighteenth century philosopher and; utilitarianism or consequentialism, which derives its modern day instructions from eighteenth and nineteenth century philosophers Jeremey Bentham and J. S. Mills, respectively (Hursthouse:1999)Read MoreAristotle on Friendship Essay1134 Words   |  5 PagesAristotle on Friendship We are social creatures. We surround ourselves with other human beings, our friends. It is in our nature. We are constantly trying to broaden the circumference of our circle of friends. Aristotle understood the importance of friendship, books VIII and IX of the Nicomachean Ethics deal solely with this topic. A modern day definition of a friend can be defined as â€Å"one joined to another in intimacy and mutual benevolence independently of sexual or family love†. (OxfordRead MoreKant And Kant s Decision Procedures1143 Words   |  5 Pageswrong to kill a healthy person and consequently, this creates a problem for act utilitarians. With regard to Kantianism, Kant believes that moral duty is based on reason. Every rational being must consider the decision procedure for moral reasoning to determine if their action is morally permissible and can be universalized. However, Kant’s decision procedures may lead to conflict. Kant endorses the claim that one must never lie , regardless of the circumstance. As discussed in class, we are tempted toRead MoreNicomachean Ethics: Ruminations on Virtue Essay1088 Words   |  5 PagesNicomachean Ethics: Ruminations on Virtue Humans are categorized as the only rational animal; we have the ability to reason, and using our skills of reasoning allows us to oftentimes act against what (could be considered) a â€Å"natural† instinct and do something seemingly selfless simply because it conforms to the individual’s notion of what is right. There is an inherent self-awareness to human sentience that does, indeed reasonably separate us from the animal kingdom. However our defining self-awareness